Clear Review has joined Advanced - Discover our full suite of powerful and innovative people management solutions

Find out more
Back to blog

How IBM revamped its performance management system

IBM Performance management

For the last 10 years, tech­nol­o­gy giant IBM has been oper­at­ing an annu­al-based per­for­mance review process that will be famil­iar to most organ­i­sa­tions — set­ting of objec­tives in Jan­u­ary, an inter­im review mid-way through the year and then an appraisal meet­ing in Decem­ber cul­mi­nat­ing in a sin­gle per­for­mance score.

Last year it decid­ed to fol­low in the foot­steps of many oth­er well known organ­i­sa­tions such as Microsoft, Accen­ture and Gen­er­al Elec­tric and under­take a com­plete over­haul of its per­for­mance man­age­ment sys­tem. That revamp is now com­plete and its new sys­tem called Check­point” has just gone live.

Like most oth­er organ­i­sa­tions who have moved away from an annu­al approach, IBM’s new per­for­mance man­age­ment process involves set­ting short­er term objec­tives and get­ting reg­u­lar feed­back through­out the year.

In an inter­view with For­tune Mag­a­zine, Diane Gher­son, IBM’s Chief Human Resources Offi­cer said that dur­ing the year, new things would come along” mean­ing that employ­ees would often no longer be work­ing towards their orig­i­nal annu­al objec­tives. Yet they would end up in an irrel­e­vant dis­cus­sion” in Decem­ber try­ing to assess whether they’d achieved those goals they’d cre­at­ed 11 months earlier.

When decid­ing what to do dif­fer­ent­ly, IBM took a nov­el approach and inter­nal­ly crowd­sourced feed­back from its 360,000 employ­ees. They received 2,000 respons­es from which the con­clu­sion was that employ­ees want­ed more fre­quent feed­back. They also did­n’t want a sin­gle per­for­mance rat­ing with rel­a­tive rank­ings, nor did they want a self-assess­ment process.

So IBM’s new process ensures that employ­ees get feed­back at least every quar­ter. They have also dropped their sin­gle per­for­mance score and replaced it with an assess­ment against five cri­te­ria — busi­ness results, impact on client suc­cess, inno­va­tion, per­son­al respon­si­bil­i­ty to oth­ers, and skills. In the old sys­tem, there was one score. Peo­ple [got] sort of obsessed by that,” Gher­son said. In the new sys­tem, there are five scores. It leads to a much rich­er, more bal­anced discussion.”

Being a large tech­nol­o­gy com­pa­ny, IBM built its own app to help facil­i­tate its new Check­point” process. How­ev­er, most organ­i­sa­tions don’t have vast in-house tech­ni­cal resources like IBM and most per­for­mance man­age­ment sys­tems are still based around an annu­al cycle. That’s why we built our Clear Review app. Now any organ­i­sa­tion can move to a year-round approach to per­for­mance man­age­ment with reg­u­lar check-ins and real-time feed­back using Clear Review.

To find out how Clear Review can trans­form your per­for­mance man­age­ment, book a per­son­al demo right now via our online demo book­ing sys­tem.